3-D Theater Deal Offers Hollywood More Incentive to Make Crappy Movies

Photo: Hulton Archive/Getty Images
Sure, this sounds perhaps overly technophobic, and we're never ones to deny the pleasures of a big, fat cinema spectacle. But, as many have pointed out, there's little difference between the current vogue for 3-D among studios and theater owners and the various audience-baiting technological advancements introduced into theaters in the fifties, as movies were panicking about competition from newly emergent television.
Does this mean that the movies Hollywood makes over the next few years will be empty spectacles on par with early 3-D and Cinemascope features? Maybe not — maybe they'll just be the same movies they were going to make anyway, only they'll cost $15 million more to make than expected, thanks to 3-D expenses. But, on the other hand, maybe so. After all, the shining star of the new 3-D revolution is not an action movie or a fantasy film or even, you know, porn; it's Hannah Montana & Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert. Are you ready to pay $17 to see more of that?

The Transformation of TV Into an Art Form
The Draw of Dream Worlds in Film
Gosselin, Prince of the Professional Nobodies
A Decade of Defining Moments in Pop-Culture