More Colorful Characters Descend on R. Kelly Trial
6/4/08 at 9:45 AM

Photo: Getty Images
Neither has been called as a witness, but Van Allen mentioned their names in court on Monday and claimed that Kelly's business manager paid Murrell $20,000 to return a second sex tape featuring one of those threesomes (both men currently refuse to say if they know of any additional copies). Also, Freeman sued Kelly in 2002 for reneging on a deal to pay him $100,000 for recovering the sex tape at the center of this case (we certainly hope he lost because clearly he didn't do a very good job). "The truth lies in Kansas!," Freeman told the Chicago Sun-Times last night. "Everything will come out when we get to Chicago. It will be big news." He added cryptically, "There's more to this case than R. Kelly."
What the heck does that mean? We have no idea! Is any of this good news for R. Kelly? Probably not!
Can Kansas City duo shed light on alleged threesome tape? [Kelly Chronicles/Chicago Sun-Times]
Email
Print
The Trouble With Product Integration
Meet the Matisse of Subway-Ad Mash-ups
Equus Is Ready for the Glue Factory
The Coolest Hand: Paul Newman, 1925–2008