The British Are Angry! The British Are Angry!

Photo: iStockphoto.com
From: info@campaignforlittlebritain.com
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:20:24 PM
To: intelHi
Got to take issue with your article, it is in the tradition of already recognised neighborhoods, check out Little Brazil, Koreatown, or Little India — they were started by businesses, too.
Secondly, like many small, local businesses, we are a little mom-and-pop operation being pushed out by bigger global brands who are forcing the rents up, so we came up with the idea to compete with them and then got some backing, which is no different from how any lobbying campaign works, except we were completely transparent about it.As for historical relevance see attached NYT article from 1902.
Got no problem with people not liking the idea (over 6,000 do, the majority of whom are NY residents), but some of what you have written is inaccurate and [we] think you should correct it.
Cheers!
CFLB
We remain skeptical. Is Koreatown an official designation for which local businesses lobbied the city? Or is it merely a descriptive term for an area that has a lot of Korean businesses? We suspect the latter. (Anyone know officially, for any of those neighborhoods?) But here's the point: Even if Koreatown is an official designation, it's also clearly a descriptive term. Has anyone ever colloquially thought of that slice of the West Village as "Little Britain"? CFLB says yes — once, in the Times, in 1902. We doubt anyone has since.
Odd Corners of New York [NYT via CFLB press release]
Earlier: Defy British Imperialism: A Belated Call for a New York Tea Party

How Brooklyn Became America's Music Capital 
The Times Journalist Too Big to Fail
Can NBC Be Saved?
Bloomberg's New Political Challengers