Clinton: Pulling a Rudy or Sure to Bounce Back?

Is it curtains for Clinton?Photo: Getty Images
• Patrick Healy paints a picture of panic in Hillary-land, with worried donors and supporters clamoring for answers. [NYT]
• Craig Crawford writes that the Clinton supporters are again “spinning doomsday scenarios,” but that their doing so may actually resurrect the campaign, as it has done before. [Trail Mix/CQ Politics]
• Noam Scheiber doesn’t think Clinton can count on winning over superdelegate support if she has fewer pledged delegates than Obama come August. [Stump/New Republic]
• Matthew Yglesias doesn’t buy Clinton’s explanation for losing Louisiana, recalling a time not too long ago when she had more than marginal support among African-Americans. [Atlantic]
• Josh Marshall isn’t sure if Clinton’s Rudy-reminiscent strategy of writing off unfavorable states and focusing on Texas and Ohio will work after a month of losses. [Talking Points Memo]
• And about Texas: Andrew Sullivan looks at the crazy delegate math there and says that, even if Clinton wins by five points, she’ll lose by three delegates. [Atlantic]
• But E.J. Dionne Jr. writes that there’s still a large swath of middle-aged working-class Hillary supporters who are immune to Obama’s charms. [Washington Post]
• John Dickerson thinks it’s too early to count Hillary out just yet: Obama, as front-runner, will face increasing scrutiny, and she actually has a more hard-core group of supporters and can win over the superdelegates. [Slate] —Dan Amira
For a complete guide to presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama — from First Love to Most Embarrassing Gaffe — read the 2008 Electopedia.

Dissecting Obama's Extended Family
The Bitter Aftermath of the Taconic Crash
The Kidney Transplant That Saved Two Lives
Why True Fans Endure the Knicks’ Rebuilding