Joe Bruno Calls Foul on Paterson for Following His Own Lead

Photo: Getty Images
It's a cowardly tactic used all too frequently in Albany, on both sides of the aisle (remember when Sheldon Silver wouldn't put congestion pricing to a vote?). By refusing to put a contentious bill to a vote, party leaders can kill measures that are outside of their agenda while protecting individual legislators from having to take controversial stances and alienate their constituents. But it effectively takes power out of their own hands, too. So when Bruno complains that Paterson has taken the Legislature out of the equation, he really only has himself to blame. The State Senate would have had their chance to voice an opinion (positive or negative) on gay marriage, were it not for Bruno.
Now Bruno has suggested introducing a Defense of Marriage Act to legally reverse Paterson's mandate. But he knows well that it will never get through the Assembly (they overwhelmingly approved gay marriage just last year, remember?). It's just another blustery move to make it seem like he is in favor of legislative process.
According to the Times, legal challenges to Paterson's order face an uphill battle. But if today's headlines are anything to go by, that won't slow the public outcry against it. After all, in politics, what you say is more important than what you do, right?
Bruno to fight gay marriage recognition [NYDN]
GAY-MARITAL DISCORD [NYP]
Gay Marriage Opponents Consider Ways to Fight New Policy [NYT]
Earlier: David Paterson Sneaks Gay Marriage In Through The Back Door

Tantrums Erupt Over Wall Street Pay
What's Bill Bratton's Next Career Move?
The Political Fictions Project
Smith on the Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Trial 