Keith Olbermann: I'm Not Crazy, But Murdoch Fired Me Anyway

Photo: Getty Images
I said, in short, this is your candy store, if you don't want me to run this, I'm not running it, and I'm not leaking it, but at minimum you should know the story's out there. And the guy's answer was, thanks for thinking of us, here's our official denial, please report it and whatever your sources tell you, just please make clear that none of your sources are within the company (baseball was, and is, extremely touchy about when a team is, or isn't, "officially" for sale, and woe betide the owner who makes a deal before the "officially" kicks in). So I ran the Dodgers-Are-Unofficially-For-Sale story (with the "the sources aren't NewsCorp" caveat taking almost as long as the story itself) and everything was swell.
Needless to say, Olbermann was fired shortly after. He later heard that it was because of the Dodgers story. Not one to miss a good jab, though, he ended his e-mail to TVNewser with a classic self-referential thrust. "As to the 'crazy' part, he had to pay me $800,000 for the rest of 2001, and lord knows how many tens of millions I've helped MSNBC take out of his pocket ever since," he writes. "So: who's crazy?"
Eh, we bet Bill O'Reilly could have come up with a better kicker.
Olbermann Responds to Murdoch's "Crazy" Remark [TVNewser/Mediabistro]

How Brooklyn Became America's Music Capital 
The Times Journalist Too Big To Fail
Can NBC Be Saved?
Bloomberg's New Political Challengers