After Emergency Meeting, Government Shutdown Closer to Happening, Not Happening [Updated]

US Speaker of the House John Boehner (R) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid speak to the press at the White House in Washington on April 6, 2011 after holding crunch Oval Office talks with President Barack Obama seeking to break a budget stalemate threatening to close vast swathes of the US government within two days. Obama earlier told his Republican foes to act like adults and "quit playing games" while they accused him of a lack of leadership, in a row that could choke government finances, halt paychecks for troops in the field and close US national parks.. AFP PHOTO/Nicholas KAMM (Photo credit should read NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images) Photo: NICHOLAS KAMM/2011 AFP

President Obama's emergency meeting Wednesday night with House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid failed to come up with a deal to avert a looming government shutdown. President Obama had attended campaign events in Pennsylvania and New York during the day, believing an agreement was close, but later called the two "to the White House for a meeting that would start minutes after he returned from New York." Afterward, Boehner and Reid sounded as if they were getting closer:

After trading public accusations earlier in the day, Boehner and Reid sounded a far more conciliatory tone Wednesday night. “I have confidence that we can get this done,” Reid said, adding that the group had “narrowed the issues significantly.”

Boehner, who has not made a joint appearance with Reid on a legislative matter in recent memory, agreed that “some progress” had been made and “there’s an intent on both sides . . . to work together to try to resolve this.”

Obama, making a late-night appearance before reporters, was also hopeful:

Obama emerged before reporters to declare his differences with the House Republicans were narrowing but both sides were still stuck in an impasse.

"I thought the meetings were frank, they were constructive, and what they did was narrow the issues and clarify the issues that are still outstanding," Obama said.

"I remain confident that if we're serious about getting something done, we should be able to complete a deal and get it passed and avert a shutdown," he added. "But it's going to require a sufficient sense of urgency from all parties involved."

At the same time, though, Boehner made sure to emphasize that there's “no agreement on a number, and there’s no agreement on the policy questions.” And even if the two sides can reach a deal before Saturday, it's unlikely that they could get it through both houses of Congress before the deadline. Though Republicans will vote on a one-week extension bill in the House today, Democrats aren't on board with the idea, especially since it includes things like "an unrelated provision to ban federal and local government funding for abortions in the District." By offering up such a bill, Democrats accuse Boehner of merely trying to absolve themselves of blame in the event of a shutdown, which is looking less likely with every optimistic quote from Boehner, Reid, and Obama, but more likely with every hour that passes without a budget deal.

Obama Meeting Fails to End Stalemate Over Federal Budget [NYT]
Obama says shutdown would be ‘inexcusable’ [WP]
Obama confident of budget deal as shutdown looms [MSNBC]

Update: This morning, Reid said he was much less optimistic about a deal, despite agreement on how much to cut, because of the GOP's inclusion of policy riders dealing with abortion and the environment:

“The numbers are basically there, but I am not nearly as optimistic — and that’s an understatement — as I was 11 hours ago,” Reid said. “The numbers are extremely close, and our differences are no longer over how much savings we get on government spending. The only thing holding up an agreement is ideology. I’m sorry to say that my friend, the speaker, and the Republican leadership have drawn a line in the sand not dealing with the deficit we know we have to deal with, not with the numbers that fund the government for the rest of this fiscal year. The issue is ideology, not numbers.”