In an article last weekend about the brutal rape of an elderly woman in Central Park, the New York Times underestimated the power of Google and inadvertently provided information that led to the victim's identity, something generally avoided in journalism. When notified that a "brief quotation" from the victim's blog (which was not named) could be searched and traced to the woman's website, the paper quickly edited the story, public editor Margaret Sullivan reports today, adding that the reporters and editors were "careful ... but not careful enough." Police bureau chief Wendy Ruderman, who co-wrote the article, admitted, "Over all, the Internet is a huge challenge — I have struggled with it a lot." The 73-year-old victim, though, was forgiving of the mistake, calling Ruderman "a gem."
Photo: Bloomberg/2011 Bloomberg
- 1. Fact-Checking the Age-Old Rumors of Walt Disney’s Dark Side
- 2. Guy Doing Sign Language at Mandela Memorial Was Actually Just Waving His Arms Around
- 3. All the Snubs and Surprises From the 2014 Golden Globe Nominations
- 4. The Dumbest GIFs From the Victoria’s Secret TV Special
- 5. Megyn Kelly Believes in (White) Santa
- 6. Rashida Jones Was a Whore Between 2007 and 2011
- 7. Why Adult Women Squeal Like Teenage Girls Sometimes
- 8. The 2014 Golden Globe Nominations Are Here!
- 9. The Best, Worst, & Sheerest Fashion Moments of 2013