That was the debate on the final day of former New York State Senate leader Joe Bruno’s corruption trial yesterday. Prosecutors portrayed Bruno as a tough-guy who used his position in the State Senate to benefit the clients he kept as a part-time lawyer. Prosecutors also said he took steps to hide the conflicts between his private business activities and his public duties. Then William Pericak, one of two U.S. attorneys prosecuting the case, started talking about Bruno and calling him “Tiny,” for some reason:
The defense told a different story, about a man who worked hard as a part-time legislator and followed the rules as best as he understood them. But their version of Bruno was also named “Tiny”:
The creative writing teacher was clearly also there.
In Closing Arguments, Bruno as Bully or Honest Worker [NYT]