ink-stained wretches

Politico Made Jill Abramson Cry

Jill Abramson, executive editor of The New York Times, listens during a panel discussion on the sidelines of the Republican National Convention (RNC) in Tampa, Florida, U.S., on Sunday, Aug. 26, 2012. The discussion, held across the river from the Republican National Convention, was sponsored by Bloomberg, the University of Southern California?s Annenberg Center on Communication, Leadership and Policy and the Institute of Politics at Harvard University?s John F. Kennedy School of Government.
Photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg/Getty Images

New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson is not going to pretend she doesn’t feel feelings, if only for a moment. “I cried,” she told Newsweek flatly of the Politico story in which anonymous Times staffers called her “impossible” and “very, very unpopular.” (The portrayal was at least borderline sexist, as pointed out by Abramson’s No. 2, who said “here’s a really easy caricature that some people have bought into, of the bitchy woman character …”) “I should say it went right off me, but I’m just being honest,” Abramson continued with a few months of hindsight. “I did cry. But by the next morning, I wasn’t completely preoccupied by it anymore. I had my cry and that was that.”

But lest anyone get the idea that the first-ever female editor atop the Times is weak, the story’s author Lloyd Grove, an old colleague who calls her “down-to-earth, whip-smart, funny, and fun,” provides an opposing anecdote:

As we talk, uniformed maintenance workers begin carrying away chairs and tables to set up for a corporate event, and in due course a young guy approaches and tells us we have to leave. “I’m the executive editor — I need to be here for a little while,” Abramson declares flatly. “You can tell your boss to come talk to me, OK?”

Wisely, he retreats. Abramson is nothing if not formidable.

It’s a balancing act, and she appears to be pulling it off.

Politico Made Jill Abramson Cry