Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith onstage with President Donald Trump at a rally in Southaven, Mississippi, last month.
Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images
Republican senator Cindy Hyde-Smith, who is facing a November 27 runoff election in Mississippi against Democrat Mike Espy, joked with supporters earlier this month about attending a “public hanging.” A video of the remark, which she made at a campaign stop in Tupelo on November 2, was shared on social media Sunday morning by Bayou Brief journalist Lamar White Jr. In the video, after hearing praise from a supporter, Hyde-Smith jokes that “if he invited me to a public hanging, I’d be in the first row.”
Hyde-Smith and Espy — who in 1987 became the first black Mississippian to be elected to Congress since Reconstruction, and later became the first black secretary of agriculture under President Clinton — were the two candidates who received the most votes in a four-person special election on Tuesday. Since no candidate received a majority of votes, the result triggered a runoff election between the top two. Hyde-Smith was appointed by Mississippi governor Phil Bryant to replace ailing senator Thad Cochran back in April, but still had to win the special election to serve out the remaining two years of Cochran’s term.
Mississippi, as the Jackson Free-Press explains in its report on Hyde-Smith’s comments, has a singularly terrible history when it comes to lynchings, racism, and the oppression of black Americans:
Between 1877 and 1950, Mississippi had the highest number of lynchings of African Americans of any state in the United States, just as the state had been the wealthiest from slavery before the Civil War, and then later passed the most onerous laws after Reconstruction to stop black people from voting and gain equal rights in the state.
Across Mississippi, 654 lynchings were reported in that period, including two in Lee County, where Hyde-Smith’s comments were made. Lynchings — extrajudicial mob justice used to intimidate African Americans — were usually done by hanging, often in front of crowds of joyous whites who even mailed postcards with lynching photographs to friends and family.
Mike Espy will face Cindy Hyde-Smith in a runoff on November 27. (AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis)
Photo: Rogelio V. Solis/AP
Espy called Hyde-Smith’s remarks “reprehensible” in a statement released Sunday evening:
They have no place in our political discourse, in Mississippi, or our country. We need leaders, no dividers, and her words show that she lacks the understanding and judgment to represent the people of our state.
Hyde-Smith responded to the outrage over the video as well, but dismissed the idea that what she said was somehow racist.
“In a comment on Nov. 2, I referred to accepting an invitation to a speaking engagement.” the senator said in a statement. “In referencing the one who invited me, I used an exaggerated expression of regard, and any attempt to turn this into a negative connotation is ridiculous.”
But City University of New York historian Angus Johnson argued in a Twitter thread on Sunday that there could be no plausible other meaning for what Hyde-Smith had said other than a reference to lynching:
The last execution by hanging in Mississippi occurred in 1940. The last alleged lynching by hanging in Mississippi occurred in 2018. Cindy Hyde-Smith was born in 1959. Public executions aren’t part of the history of Mississippi in her lifetime. Lynchings are.
And of course many of Mississippi’s public executions were themselves legal lynchings. To speak of “public hangings” in Mississippi is to evoke a long and brutal history of racial terror.
To joke about it is to utter an obscenity. Whatever her intention, Hyde-Smith’s joke amounts to this: ‘We are not the kind of people who are hanged. We are the kind of people who do the hanging.’
“I’m shocked that somebody would still use a reference like that in this day and time,” Espy’s communication director, Danny Blanton, told the Free-Press on Sunday. “Regardless of what context it was used in, it still showed a lack of judgment.”
The scandal also follows an incident on election day in Mississippi when a voter was photographed at the polls wearing a racist T-shirt on which “Mississippi justice” appeared with a Confederate flag and a noose:
A onetime Democrat who switched parties in 2010 while serving in the Mississippi State Senate, Hyde-Smith is the first woman to represent Mississippi in the U.S. Senate. In August, President Trump endorsed Hyde-Smith over another Republican in Mississippi’s State Senate, Chris McDaniel. McDaniel is an anti-Establishment conservative who had been encouraged to run against Hyde-Smith by none other than former Trump adviser Steve Bannon. That was a potential problem, as the Washington Post explained at the time:
Candidates of all parties will compete on the same special election ballot in Mississippi. If none of them receive a majority of the vote, the top two finishers will head to a runoff.
Some Republicans have worried that if McDaniel, a polarizing figure, advances to a runoff against a Democratic candidate, the seat would be at risk of flipping from red to blue.
Hyde-Smith’s Trump-aligned campaign even criticized McDaniel in September for spouting racist rhetoric. McDaniel had said that he wanted to ask black Mississippians whether they were any better off “after 100 years of begging for federal government scraps.” In response, Hyde-Smith’s communications director said that McDaniel had “demeaned the African-American population in Mississippi.” Governor Bryant — an award-winning member of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, which designates April as “Confederate History Month” every year — who backed a state boycott of Nike after it hired Colin Kaepernick for an ad campaign, also attacked McDaniel over the rhetoric.
But if a majority of Mississippi voters reject Hyde-Smith over her “public hanging” joke — an outcome which is obviously no guarantee in a deep-red state with a long, violent history of racism — the calculation that McDaniel would have been a worse candidate in a runoff might not work out as the GOP and White House planned.
On Tuesday, Hyde-Smith and McDaniel seemed to split the state’s Republican vote, with Hyde-Smith taking 32 percent to McDaniel’s 24.8 percent. Espy ended up with 41.5 percent of the vote, but FiveThirtyEight still gives him only a one-in-four chance of ultimately winning the Senate seat. Hyde-Smith, as of Sunday, had a seven-in-ten chance.
This post has been updated throughout. A previous version incorrectly indicated that Senator Hyde-Smith switched parties in 1999. It was in 2010.