Genre
Action/Adventure, SciFi/Fantasy, Suspense/Thriller
Producer
J.J. Abrams, Bryan Burk
Distributor
Paramount
Release Date
Jan 18, 2008
Release Notes
Nationwide
Official Website
Review
Most of us like to get our money’s worth and actually see
the monster flattening buildings, but against the odds, Cloverfield is a kick.
The film, helmed by Felicity director Matt Reeves (talk about going
outside the genre), centers on a bunch of attractive twentysomethings at a
going-away party in a Tribeca loft. The gathering’s for Rob (Michael
Stahl-David), who’s taking a job in Japan and leaving behind Beth
(Odette Yustman), the old friend he can’t bring himself to tell he adores. To
document the festivities, Rob’s brother Jason (Mike Vogel) and Jason’s
girlfriend, Lily (Jessica Lucas), thrust a digital-video camera into the hands
of Hud (T.J. Miller), a likable loser with a crush on Marlena (Lizzy Caplan), a
dark-eyed cutie who couldn’t find him less compelling.
We see the beast for only brief instants via the swerving, un-Hollywood-like
camera, which means our imagination fills in the rest—great. The thing
appears to be just as disoriented as the people running from it, only a lot
more pissed off. To make matters worse, it didn’t come alone. It shakes off
spiderlike parasites that rip people up and infect the survivors with something
deeply icky. You almost forget that Hud picking up his camera after a bloody
attack on the group is more improbable than a giant monster stomping Manhattan.
The kid in you might crave a more objective view of the creature — not to
mention the catharsis that comes from watching science and the military
collaborate to bring the monster down, etc. That said, we’ve sat through that
kind of movie again and again, but we’ve never sat through anything with Cloverfield’s
subjective sting. You’d have to be tougher than I was not to be blown sideways
by it.
— David Edelstein
| 7.5 |
"Recommended" Average Reader Rating on a Scale of 10 |
 |
| 0% |
Better rented? |
| 0% |
Good for kids? |
|
|
Definitely not Avant Garde but a well made sci-fi flick
lecerclerouge from 11850 | Posted on 4/24/08
Overall Rating: 8 (Recommended)
Well. I don`t give a damn about what the New York Times has to say on anything. Cloverfield is not a masterpiece but is a very effective piece of low budget cinema, We don´t like to see anything that reminds us of 9-11, be honest when writing a review and don´t just come rampant to try to say what you can´t:That it disturbed you because it reminds Us New Yorkers of 9-11 but this is a movie, a well made one, it can produce some vertigo and it´s not a crowd pleaser but it deserves an 8 because we can´t dismiss an effective sci-fi thriller that pays tribute so well to fifties movies and japanese hysteria but trascended to the level of a documentary watched by the government in the aftermath of the disaster inside the movie.
Got my ten dollars worth
dshah from 08879 | Posted on 1/21/08
Overall Rating: 9 (Highly Recommended)
Absolutely loved it. Though there were times when the cinematography gave me a slight headache. Other than that the movie was great. The ending was particularly my favorite. I recommend this film to everyone who can tough out little camera jitters on the big screen.
Read All 4 Reviews >>