“It became the office joke,” Jason reports, “Victoria’s vagina and how I’d never even seen it.” This did not stop Jason from selling this facet of his charge’s anatomy. “You bet I did,” Jason remembers. “Big hedge-fund guys, the heaviest hitters, called and I’d say, this is the girl with the magic pussy, the best in New York. It bumped her price way up.”
It was all true, Jason said; if I didn’t believe him, I could call Natalia, his former girlfriend and queen bee of NY Confidential, the “$2,000-an-Hour Woman” herself. Having been sent to Rikers for a month following the agency bust, Natalia, now going by her real name, Natalie McLennan, was back in her Montreal home putting the final touches on her autobiography, The Price, due out this fall. She backed up her former boyfriend. “Believe me,” Natalia said. “Victoria and I, we did a lot of doubles. You do a double, sometimes guys want to, you know, watch. As soon as I saw her coochie, I told Jason, this is special.”
Was this it? The smoking, so to speak, gun in the entire Spitzer saga? Could it be as simple, as elemental, as that he couldn’t get enough of the girl with the magic pussy? Whatever the case may be, Spitzer’s downfall has been a vindication, an ultimate revenge, says Jason. “Ordinarily, I would have a lot of sympathy for a guy like this. But this guy helped shut me down. Put me in jail. Put all the girls out of work. Now he’s caught in his own trap. The biggest Dudley Do-Right becomes the King of Hypocrites.”
This was the kicker, Jason chortled: The girl he “trained” to be a high-priced whore took down Spitzer, prissy steamroller No. 1. It was, Jason said, “a Pygmalion thing.”
This invocation of the George Bernard Shaw classic of social transformation raises the question of what exactly goes into being a woman for whom someone like Eliot Spitzer would risk violating the Mann Act (the 1910 statute prohibiting the transport of a woman across state lines for “immoral purposes”—people previously prosecuted for this offense include Charlie Chaplin, Jack Johnson, and Chuck Berry). As any of the women sometimes seen in hotels like the Four Seasons and the Rivington knows, paid sex at the high end is almost never just about the fucking. For insight we consulted Amelia, a self-described “mid-multi-diamond Russian hooker” who commands as much as $1,500 an hour.
“I was trying out for these chorus parts on Broadway plays, and this guy approaches me. He tells me how much money I can make. I brushed him off, but I guess that’s where I really got the idea. I figured I could make myself into that high-end girl the guy was talking about. When they talk about the $500 girl and $1,500 girl, it is all in the details. I had to lose like ten pounds. I got a guy to take care of my teeth, made them pearly. I started to go to the $75 manicurist, not the $8 Korean. There were the shoes, the haircut, all that. You’re making yourself up for a part. These rich guys, some want that down-and-dirty thing, the $20 blow job in the car, like Hugh Grant. But most want this upscale fantasy. Their wives are already perfect, so you have to be more perfect. You give them perfect, plus—that’s what loosens them up.”
For many men, truly perfect means without a condom. “That’s the final taboo, that’s the last piece,” says one high-rolling businessman. “Not using one would mean that the girl cares for you because she’s making the big step. It’s an interesting psychology.”
Was this what Eliot Spitzer, the man who had everything, was looking for: perfect, plus? The thousands of hand-wringing hours of Spitzerian motivational psychology aside, there’s no doubt that it takes a lot to morph the man who was spoken of as a potential first Jewish president into the first black, blind governor of the state. One thing’s for sure, if Spitzer, the scourge of Wall Street, was caught in a stock finagle, no one would have cared, not this much. Sex is another matter altogether.
Questions float up. The hookers will tell you: Lies are easy; the truth is in the body language. That said, could there be any limit to the repression behind Spitzer’s tight frown, perhaps the tightest frown in history, during his initial apology speech? You wonder. Is there any redemption in throwing your whole life away just to scratch the itch of the unquelled libido? Where’s Norman Mailer when you really need him?
Face it, Spitzer might have been a prick, but at least he claimed to be our prick. That is the sad thing about this. This point was not missed even among the supposedly cynical precincts of so-called high-end prostitution. I asked Natalia, who had just done her own close-up on the Today show, how she really felt about Spitzer.
“You know, some guys, you give them a peek of the wild side … Well, you know. The last thing you want to do is mess up someone’s life. You could say he was really stupid. I mean, a wire transfer, wtf, dude! But I don’t like to use the word stupid. I’m going to say it was very unfortunate. The whole thing is very unfortunate.”