Skip to content, or skip to search.

Skip to content, or skip to search.

The Etch-a-Sketch Moment

At the debate in Denver, it finally happened—but Obama looked like the one who was shaken.


Illustration by Andy Friedman  

When Mitt Romney took to the debate stage at the University of Denver Wednesday night, he was shouldering both a blessing and a curse. The blessing was that of expectations so low they were practically subterranean: According to the polls, voters believed by nearly a two-to-one margin that Romney was fated to be beaten by Barack Obama. The curse was that of an almost impossibly high bar to clear in order to be seen by the political-media class as having won. He needed to alter fundamentally a campaign dynamic that was ushering him inexorably to Loserville. He needed to challenge Obama forcefully while improving his dismal favorability ratings. He needed to be tough but likable, aggressive but not assholic. He needed to be convincingly presidential but also recognizably human. He needed, in other words, to be the Mitt Romney whom no one has glimpsed for, oh, the past six years that he’s been running for the White House.

And then, lo and behold, he was. Now, to be sure, the effusiveness of the post-debate praise for Romney on the right was at times over the top. (No, Michael Barone, he was not Sitting Bull at Little Big Horn.) But Romney was clear, crisp, confident, and in command of his bullet points. His indictments of Obama were energetic but not shrill. He came across as a pragmatist, a manager, a moderate and not an extremist—like the Romney who ran for office in Massachusetts in 1994 and 2002. That Romney was always a plausible president, and his sudden appearance made you wonder: Where the hell has this guy been?

Then there was President Obama. It would be easier to grade his performance had he bothered to show up. Obama was the man who wasn’t there—passive and pedantic, enduring the experience rather than engaging it, not an ounce of verve or fight or passion in him. Some wags joked that Obama seemed to be debating as if he were on Ambien. Well, I know Ambien. Ambien is a friend of mine. And this was no Ambien performance. It was more like Obama had been sucked into a K-hole, or was suffering from aphasia.

The question, of course, is what the actual, tangible effect of the debate will be—and the answer is that it all depends on what happens next. History tells us that presidential debates rarely alter the electoral outcome, and the drop of the unemployment rate to under 8 percent for the first time since Obama took office may prove more consequential. But make no mistake, this debate mattered. Overnight, the wind and weather of the campaign shifted, and Romney, on the brink of entering a Bob Dole–like death spiral, was endowed with new life.

The avoidance of that spiral was, in fact, Romney’s paramount achievement. After a horrific month of September, much of the Republican Establishment and its donor class were close to abandoning him as a lost cause and turning their efforts (and channeling their dollars) to House and Senate campaigns. But the drubbing Romney administered to Obama foreclosed that dire possibility. Never mind that he extended a stiff middle finger to the fire-breathing right by recasting himself as Moderate Mitt. After weeks of having a likely loss jammed down their throats, conservatives thrilled at the taste of victory on their tongues. So in addition to the war whoops that went up on Thursday morning, the other sound you heard was that of checkbooks being opened and pens scrawling out donations to the super-pacs whose spending will enable Romney to stay competitive in the last month of the race.

Romney’s second big accomplishment in the debate was earning himself a second look from the sliver of the electorate that remains undecided. For those voters, Romney has been largely defined as a plutocrat whose policies favor the rich and who has no comprehension of the struggles of ordinary people. How much did his debate performance move the needle with them? The polling will tell us in the days ahead. But it’s worth noting that because the relevant topics didn’t come up, nothing Romney said in Denver is likely to remedy his problems with Hispanics, women, and other key demographic groups that prefer Obama by wide margins—margins that in turn undergird his slender but meaningful advantage in the battleground states.

For Romney, the challenge now is to capitalize on the opening he cleared for himself. In the past, he has demonstrated an unerring propensity to follow up on any triumph by inserting both of his wingtips simultaneously in his piehole. The day after Denver, Romney played it safe, doing a single campaign event (with fireworks!) and an interview with Sean Hannity, in which he continued his latest reinvention by renouncing his denunciation of 47 percent as irredeemable moochers as “completely wrong.” But with more than a week to go before his next debate with Obama at Hofstra University on October 16, Romney will be faced with ample opportunities to enhance his new, improved image or revert to form. Which Mitt Romney will we see? Your guess is as good as mine.


Current Issue
Subscribe to New York

Give a Gift