New York Magazine

Skip to content, or skip to search.

Skip to content, or skip to search.

Twin Piques

In "Wrong Mountain," David Hirson prattles on (again!) about high art vs. low.

ShareThis

Imagine a play in which every line either sounds like a quotation (bad enough), is a quotation (worse), or is one character quoting another (worse yet). And even the lines that merely sound like quotations are also in a way quotations, for David Hirson, the author of Wrong Mountain, is so enamored of himself that you can practically see invisible quotation marks bedecking his every utterance.

The play -- sorry, the chrestomathy -- concerns Henry Dennett, an elitist poet, at outs with his family, which includes an ex-wife about to marry a popular playwright; and a son, Adam, and a daughter, Jessica, who resent their soon-to-be-stepfather in tandem. On a bet, he writes a play that is produced by an outlandishly campy festival director, Maurice Montesor, and features a rather curious set of actors. There are also two other playwrights -- a flighty woman, and a serious youth, Clifford -- competing with Henry for the festival prize. This takes place in a bizarre location, where a kitschy goddess presides over a fountain with peculiar water.

Henry is being treated by a Broadway-besotted doctor for a huge worm that torments his insides, and there is a framing image of two moonlit snowcapped mountains. One of them is presumably the right one to climb, the other, the wrong one; unless, as we're told, all mountains are right, or all of them wrong. There is name-dropping second only to the quotation-dropping, also expressionist elements, surreal elements, pastiche, and even a miniature train that chugs across the stage from left to right and, later, from right to left -- or, perhaps, to wrong. There is distorted Grieg music blaring in the background, along with lots of symbolism in the foreground.

And mountains of verbiage. Hirson's debut was with a pretentious play in rhyming couplets, La Bête, but Wrong Mountain proves that he can be just as pretentious in prose, which ranges from the convoluted to the Gongoristic, with always a lip-smacking undertone, as you sense Hirson sucking on his polysyllables as if they were Jujubes. There is some respite here and there, when he relaxes a little, manages to get off a funny one, or allows a character to sound fleetingly human. But he promptly repents, regresses into the recondite, this time perhaps with a Latin quotation.

Unfortunately, Richard Jones, who also directed La Bête, does not palliate any of the excesses but, on the contrary, plays clankingly into them. Thus he allows Daniel Davis, a not-untalented actor, to camp up Maurice to the point of constantly threatening to turn into a balloon and float off the stage, and encourages the good Ron Rifkin, as Henry, to rant even more grandiosely than Alceste and a Thomas Kyd character rolled together. It is to Rifkin's credit that he manages to breathe some humanity into the rant.

Daniel Jenkins is likable as Clifford; Tom Riis Farrell, funny as the doctor; Bruce Norris has a nice quality as Adam; and when she stops pouting, Anne Dudek is effective as a young actress as unimpressed by Henry's play as by his hungry "old-man lips." The only truly horrible performance comes from Ilana Levine, a simpering actress you want to yank off the boards. Giles Cadle's scenery is ineffably vulgar.

The main problem, though, is the dreadful show-offiness of Hirson's endless polemics about art. He wallows in his erudition like a mud wrestler in his mud but without even the wrestler's innocence, only his swinishness. At 41, other playwrights have acted grown-up; if Hirson does not start shedding his ostentatiously bookwormish adolescence, he may end up swallowed by a library.


Related:

Advertising
Current Issue
Subscribe to New York
Subscribe

Give a Gift

Advertising