Displaying all articles tagged:

Rachel Sklar

  1. ink-stained wretches
    There’s a Mediaite Burrowing Around Inside the InternetSo far, it does not seem to have penetrated the surface layers.
  2. the chattering class
    ‘We Believe in Strong, Smart Ideas Executed Well’Dan Abrams’s new website has a bold new plan.
  3. blog-stained wretches
    Dan Abrams Now Trying to Lure Young Media People With CandyHiii there, little journalist. Would you like some candy? You just have to come over here to get it. OVER TO THE DARK SIDE.
  4. ink-stained wretches
    Which ‘Working Journalists’ Could Work for Dan Abrams?So far, it’s looking like not the ‘top’ ones.
  5. in other news
    Bill O’Reilly: The Backlash to the Blacklash Bill O’Reilly’s comments on his radio show about that time he dined at Sylvia’s with Al Sharpton, as noted by Media Matters, caused such a furor earlier this week that last night CNN was prompted to ask:”Is Bill O’Reilly Comment on Race an Imus Moment?” Today, the rage faded a little, not because of O’Reilly’s impassioned defense of himself but because it was so obvious from the tape that he was genuinely surprised by the fact that black people are just as civilized as white people. “Imus’ ‘nappy-headed hos’ remark was clear-cut, shocking racism with a hefty dash of sexism to chase,” wrote Rachel Sklar of Eat the Press. “O’Reilly’s comments were ignorant as hell and betrayed so preconceived notions, that’s for sure, but if you read his comments in full, they read like ‘clueless white guy’ rather than ‘deliberate racist.’” But is it something more than cluelessness?
  6. intel
    Rachel Sklar Available for All Your Quoting NeedsThere’s already been much ado about Charlie Gibson’s refusal to play along with Stephen Colbert’s goofy “WristStrong” campaign, and the Times article that exposed the mini-controversy. Colbert asked the Gibson and Katie Couric and Brian Williams to wear bracelets on air in order to raise awareness of “wrist violence,” and Katie and Brian, the fun anchors, are playing along. In the article Huffington Post media editor Rachel Sklar said their participation shows “good humor” and “humanity,” and then Portfolio blogger Jeff Bercovici jumped on her for it — pointing out that the whole reason people like hearing the news from Charlie Gibson is because he isn’t fun, he’s serious. But our question is why was blogger Rachel Sklar quoted as a TV news expert in the first place? Why not someone with experience in the biz who could lend more insight — or an insider? Because the article was written by young Brian Stelter, a.k.a. the wunderkind behind the blog TVNewser, that’s why. Before he was recently hired by the Gray Lady, he was Sklar’s co-worker and buddy at Mediabistro. Silly Stetler — you can’t just quote your friends. This is the Times, not the Observer! Two Out of Three Anchors Join Colbert in Wrist Stunt [NYT] Charlie Gibson Only Cool in the Ratings [Mixed Media]