Because we don’t already check our phones compulsively enough, Brigham Young University informs us that when people lie in texts or instant messages, they take longer to respond, make more edits, and write shorter messages than they typically do. In the study of 100 college-age instant messagers, lies took 10 percent longer to compose than honest messages. It gets worse. The study authors claim timing text-message responses might be one of the better lie-detection tools at our disposal. According to Tom Meservy, a professor of information systems, humans are “terrible” at lie detection, only spotting it about half the time. “We're creating methods to correct that,” he said. “We are starting to identify signs given off by individuals that aren't easily tracked by humans. The potential is that chat-based systems could be created to track deception in real-time." That would be bad news for those of us who prefer texting for the freedom to choose our words carefully and ignore people until they feel insecure.
Male Gaze: The Naked Warwick Rowers Are Baaack
See: A Harper’s Cover Shot by Erik Madigan Heck
Rashida Jones Was a Whore Between 2007 and 2011
- The Cut’s Advent Calendar: 17 Days to Go!
- Rebecca Black Finally Made It to ‘Saturday’
- The Cut’s Advent Calendar: 18 Days to Go!
- The Best of the Cut This Week
- Male Gaze: The Naked Warwick Rowers Are Baaack
- The 11 Best Pre-Fall 2014 Looks (So Far)
- See: A Harper’s Cover Shot by Erik Madigan Heck
- Rashida Jones Was a Whore Between 2007 and 2011
- Decoding the Campy, Disheveled Girls Poster
- Burn After Reading: 2013 Holiday Candle Guide
- Time Editor Is a One-Woman Paycheck Fairness Act
- Facebook Could Add a ‘Sympathize’ Button
- The Cut’s Advent Calendar: 19 Days to Go!
- Decoding Drew’s Nails to Learn About Her Womb
- Messy-Haired Sky Ferreira: New Face of Redken