Skip to content, or skip to search.

The D.J.-or-Band Debate

Bands almost always cost more than a D.J. How can a couple on a budget justify the extra expense?
Winters: To make a band more expensive, you add more pieces—horns, extra keyboards, percussion, etc.
Sozzi: I hate that. Agencies sell bigger bands to make more money. Yes, I could sell you 25 people, but the Beatles and the Rolling Stones only had four!

Don’t bands get tired and need breaks? Guests want to hear continuous music.
Fioto: It’s key for your client to constantly see you playing music. I wait to eat after.
Winters: We do the same thing. The full band plays until a course is being served. While you’re eating, you don’t want to hear the drummer bashing; you want to hear the sax, a keyboard player, and a singer doing a Norah Jones, Van Morrison, or Bruno Mars ballad. It should be smooth.
Fioto: So if you feature three people, everyone else takes breaks?
Sozzi: We do rotate, like when the cake comes out, and it feels like a whole new band. A trio performs unplugged songs by Coldplay and Amy Winehouse, but it’s still like being at a concert. People hold up lighters.

So maybe couples should just hire both a band and a D.J.?
Sozzi: That’s ideal. If you want to do a seven-hour party, feature a band during the reception and a D.J. for the after-party. You just need a big budget.
Regine: Not all bands are nice, though. They get the lead on what songs to play because they have a minimal set list. So I come out spinning with a leash around my neck. The D.J. is always working around the band; it’s never the other way around. I’d rather work with bands that have a specialty, like salsa.
Fioto: A really nice balance is having strings for the ceremony, a jazz band for the cocktail hour, and a D.J. for the party. That way, you get the best of every world.


Spot an error in a listing or want to suggest an update? Contact us.

New York Weddings issue app ad
Order the Weddings Issue Today

Cover of New York Magazine's Winter 2017 Wedding issue

Order This Issue