what other people think

Obama’s Speech Answered Some Questions, Avoided Others

Some of the fiercest critics of President Obama’s decision to intervene in Libya were opinion columnists and political pundits, who saw no consistency and no exit strategy in the military effort. Obama clearly cares about getting these elite opinion-makers on his side; he gave a bunch of them a personal briefing on the speech before it happened. But how effective was his speech last night? As we wrote yesterday evening, many people felt Obama did a good job explaining why we got involved but struggled to clarify “when” and “how” our involvement, and the Libyan civil war we’ve become participants in, is going to end.

Andrew Sullivan, Atlantic:

Eugene Robinson, Post Partisan/Washington Post:

Marc Ambinder, National Journal:

Clive Crook, Financial Times:

Marc Thiessen, Post Partisan/Washington Post:

Chris Cillizza, Fix/Washington Post:

John Podhoretz, New York Post:

Jim Geraghty, Campaign Spot/National Review:

Daniel Larison, Daily Beast:

Peter Beinart, Daily Beast:

John Dickerson, Slate:

Howard Kurtz, Daily Beast:

John B. Judis, New Republic:

David Frum, Frum Forum:

Tom Ricks, Best Defense/Foreign Policy:

Michael Crowley, Swampland/Time:

Jonathan Capehart, Post Partisan/Washington Post:

William Kristol, Blog/Weekly Standard:

Steve Benen, Political Animal/Washington Monthly:

Peter Feaver, Shadow Government/Foreign Policy:

John Nichols, Nation:

Steve Clemons, Washington Note:

Nick Gillespie, Hit & Run/Reason:

Obama’s Speech Answered Some Questions, Avoided Others