Why Beheading Videos Are Back With ISIS, and Why They Went Away

A photo taken on September 29, 2011 shows US freelance reporter James Foley resting in a room at the airport of Sirte, Libya. Foley was kidnapped in war-torn Syria six weeks ago and has been missing since, his family revealed on January 2, 2013. Foley, 39, an experienced war reporter who has covered other conflicts, was seized by armed men in the town of Taftanaz in the northern province of Idlib on November 22, according to witnesses. The reporter contributed videos to Agence France-Presse (AFP) in recent months.
Foley was kidnapped in Syria and executed by ISIS militants, according to a video that surfaced Aug. 19 2014. Photo: Aris Messinis/AFP/Getty Images

Before Jim Foley’s beheading video surfaced on Tuesday, there hadn’t been a similar one — of a Westerner, beheaded by Muslim extremist groups with the intent to change government policy — in nearly a decade. Many compared his death to that of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in 2002*, because after a spate of such videos in the early aughts, they had all but disappeared.

But their absence from the terrorsphere was not an accident, nor a gesture of goodwill.

According to University of Massachusetts, Lowell, professor Mia Bloom, the videos faded because they were frowned upon by higher-ups in organizations like Al Qaeda. Although Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a high-ranking Al Qaeda in Iraq operative, was said to have personally executed Americans Nicholas Berg and Eugene Armstrong, Bloom says superiors, including Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, looked down on the practice. 

AQI got into a lot of trouble for those public beheadings,” she says, because they did more to alienate potential supporters than to recruit them. 

What’s interesting is that you saw a drop-off of these videos because they provoked somewhat of a backlash,” agrees SUNY Albany professor Victor Asal. While everyone knew these groups were doing horrible things, including beheadings, there was something particularly distasteful about videotaping their executions. By returning to these videos, ISIS is saying, “We will do what we want, how we want,” Asal says. “Be very, very scared of us.”

But Bloom insists that these videos, should there be more of them, will backfire, in part because they expose that the reality of living in the Islamic State is quite different from ISIS recruitment videos with soft lighting. The sales pitch that appeals to many Western Muslims, she says, is that “coming to live in the caliphate is like the Ansar accompanying the prophet going back to 632.” 

Indeed, in the recruitment video starring Canadian Jihadi Andre Poulin, the man boasts about an easy life in the Caliphate, and how those who want to come fight will have their families taken care of.

The reality is very different, and, Bloom says, “It might not be the narrative that [ISIS leader] al-Baghdadi wants to project.”

For her part, Bloom attributes the return of gruesome videos to the plethora of jihadist groups currently vying for the minds of disaffected Muslims. “The more groups you have competing for everyone’s attention and loyalties, the more dangerous things tend to become,” she says. They engage in a technique she calls “outbidding,” where each tries to show how radical they are in comparison to all the others.

Unfortunately, this may also mean there are incentives for more beheadings.

*This post originally stated that Daniel Pearl died in 2004, and has been corrected.

Why Beheading Videos Are Back With ISIS