What We Know About the U.S. Military Strike Against Syria

The USS Porter fires a Tomahawk land attack missile at a Syrian airfield on April 7, 2017. Photo: U.S. Navy/Getty Images

The United States attacked a Syrian air base on Thursday night in response to the government’s chemical attack on civilians in Idlib Province earlier this week. This is the first time the U.S. has taken direct military action against Syria during the country’s six-year civil war.

“Tonight, I ordered a targeted military strike on the air base in Syria from where the chemical attack was launched,” Trump said on Thursday night. “It is in this vital national security interest of the United States to prevent and deter the spread and use of deadly chemical weapons.”

The U.S. Air Strike

Two U.S. warships — the USS Ross and USS Porter — fired 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at the Al Shayrat airfield in Homs Province in western Syria. That’s believed to be the site from which Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s forces launched the chemical attack that killed at least 100 people on Tuesday. The strike began around 4:40 a.m. local time (8:40 p.m. ET) and lasted for three or four minutes.

Al Shayrat airfield. Photo: DigitalGlobe/ScapeWare3d/DigitalGlobe/Getty Images

The strike targeted hardened aircraft shelters, petroleum and logistical storage, ammunition supply bunkers, air defense systems, and radars. The U.S. military avoided hitting a suspected sarin gas storage facility because they feared it would disperse the deadly gas.

Of the 59 cruise missiles fired, all hit their targets except for one, a source told the AP. The Kremlin disputed this, estimating that less than half — about 23 cruise missiles — hit their targets.

National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster told reporters late on Thursday night that the strike was limited, and Syria is still capable of carrying out sarin gas attacks, like it did on Tuesday. However, Captain Jeff Davis, a Pentagon spokesman, said, “Initial indications are that this strike has severely damaged or destroyed Syrian aircraft and support infrastructure and equipment at Shayrat Airfield, reducing the Syrian government’s ability to deliver chemical weapons.”

Russian and Syrian state TV also broadcast some footage that apparently shows the destruction to the al Shayrat airfield. Russian military officials downplayed the strike and called its effects on the Syrian base “extremely small.”

Russian forces were notified prior to the strike, but Secretary of State Rex Tillerson stressed that Trump did not discuss the attack with Russian President Vladimir Putin before or after it occurred. Tillerson blamed Russia for failing to ensure that Assad upheld his 2013 agreement to get rid of his chemical weapons stockpiles. “Clearly, Russia has failed in its responsibility on that commitment,” he said. “Either Russia has been complicit or has been incompetent on its ability to deliver.”

Military planners tried to “minimize risk to Russian or Syrian personnel located at the airfield,” according to Davis. U.S. forces avoided hitting the Russian military area at the airfield, and they believe no Russian planes were present during the attack.

Nine people were killed, including four children, according to Syrian state TV. The victims were reportedly from al-Shayrat and al-Hamrat villages, which are close to the base.

The attack puts the hundreds of U.S. troops already stationed in Syria to assist in the fight against ISIS at greater risk. The U.S. launched air strikes in Syria in September 2014 as part of the coalition campaign against the terrorist group, but Syrian government forces were not targeted in those attacks.

President Trump's Remarks

“Assad choked out the lives of helpless men, women, and children,” President Trump said during a brief press conference at Mar-a-Lago about an hour after the strike. “It was a slow and brutal death for so many. Even beautiful babies were cruelly murdered in this very barbaric attack. No child of God should suffer such horror.”

Trump called for “all civilized nations to join us in seeking to end the slaughter and bloodshed in Syria and also to end terrorism of all kinds and all types.”

Here’s exactly what the president said about the strike.

President Trump is at Mar-a-Lago for his meeting with Chinese president Xi Jinping. McMaster, Tillerson, and Defense Secretary James Mattis are with Trump at his Florida resort. Vice-President Mike Pence was at the White House on Thursday evening.

The Decision to Attack Syria

There’s been much confusion about the Trump administration’s position on Syria. Throughout the campaign, Trump said he was opposed to regime change in Syria, declaring during a debate, “I don’t like Assad at all, but Assad is killing ISIS.”

In 2013, Trump tweeted more than 20 times that President Obama should not attack Syria in response to Assad killing 1,400 of his people with sarin and VX gas. Though Assad crossed Obama’s “red line” by using chemical weapons, the president sought authorization from Congress to use military force against the regime. It appeared Obama did not have the support of Congress, but before a vote was taken a diplomatic solution emerged, with Syria promising to destroy its stockpile of chemical weapons.

In the past week, several Trump administration officials said removing Assad from power was no longer a priority. But then hours before Thursday’s strike, Tillerson said steps to oust Assad were already “underway.”

Trump said the chemical attack had changed his stance on Syria, but he did not elaborate on what that meant. “I will tell you that attack on children had a big, big impact on me,” he said on Wednesday. “That was a horrible, horrible thing.”

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer characterized the president’s decision as a “72-hour evolution.” Planning for a military response began in earnest just after Trump adviser Steve Bannon was booted from the National Security Council on Wednesday, a possible hint of Bannon’s waning influence. That same day, military aides presented Trump with three options for responding to Syria’s use of chemical weapons. The Intercept reported that one option involved a “saturation strike,” launching dozens of cruise missiles “in an effort to limit future Syrian Air Force attacks on rebel positions.” This involved attacks on Russian air defense systems used by the Syrians, which would have killed Russians.

That would have been a drastic shift in U.S. policy, and there’s no word on how Trump responded. According to the New York Times, he told his aides to focus on two of the proposals. Trump arrived at Mar-a-Lago Thursday afternoon, and huddled for a “meeting of considerable length” with his top national security aides. Some, including McMaster and Mattis accompanied Trump to his Florida resort; others, including Vice-President Pence, were looped in via video-conference from Washington, says Bloomberg. Trump ultimately decided to launch a far more limited strike at around 4 p.m., and then met with and dined with President Xi, where he informed the Chinese leader of the strike.

The USS Porter fires a Tomahawk land attack missile at a Syrian airfield on April 7, 2017. Photo: U.S. Navy/Getty Images

The U.S. Response

Members of Congress generally supported the strike. According to Bloomberg, the White House began quietly informing lawmakers of a possible plan to use force in Syria before Trump took his trip down to Mar-a-Lago, but before the administration finalized its strategy. The White House began official outreach to individual Congress members after the attack had been launched, reports CNN.

Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, who have been clamoring for more aggressive U.S. action against Assad for years, said it sends “an important message the United States will no longer stand idly by as Assad, aided and abetted by Putin’s Russia, slaughters innocent Syrians with chemical weapons and barrel bombs.”

But, as in 2013, lawmakers have broken into several bipartisan factions.

A White House official said more than two dozen Republican and Democratic members of Congress were briefed prior to the strike, but Trump did not seek formal congressional authorization.

Liberal Democrats like Senator Brian Schatz and Representative Ted Lieu joined with libertarian-leaning Republican Senators Rand Paul and Mike Lee in condemning Trump’s decision not to seek congressional approval.

Congressional leaders from both parties took the middle ground, applauding Thursday’s strike while suggesting that they should be consulted before further action is taken.

“Making sure Assad knows that when he commits such despicable atrocities he will pay a price is the right thing to do,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. “It is incumbent on the Trump administration to come up with a strategy and consult with Congress before implementing it.”

House Speaker Paul Ryan called the strikes “appropriate and just,” but added, “I look forward to the administration further engaging Congress in this effort.”

“It was perfectly executed and for the right purpose,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Friday, adding that Trump’s actions didn’t require congressional approval. “I support totally what the president did — a precision strike to make it clear to Assad that the use of chemical weapons is unacceptable behavior.”

In a report last month, the Congressional Research Service noted that it’s not uncommon for presidents to “commit U.S. armed forces into potential hostilities” without consulting Congress, but there is still controversy over whether the president is “constitutionally authorized to send forces into hostile situations abroad without a declaration of war or other congressional authorization.”

The Response

The attack “significantly increases” the risk of a direct U.S. confrontation with Russia, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said. Russia is backing Assad with the help of Iran.

Putin believes the U.S. attack is an “aggression against a sovereign state in violation of international law,” according to spokesman Peskov. He also said the strikes were carried out under a “far-fetched pretext.” Russia claims that the civilian deaths on Tuesday were the result of Syrian forces hitting a rebel chemical arsenal.

A statement from the Kremlin added that the U.S. committed the strike as “an attempt to distract from the mounting civilian casualties in Iraq,” an apparent reference to the Mosul bombing that killed as many as 200.

Viktor Ozerov, head of the Russian Federation Council’s defense committee, said the strike may undermine the war on ISIS. “This is an act of aggression against a U.N. member,” Ozerov said. “Cooperation between the Russian and U.S. militaries may be shut down after the U.S. strike.”

On Friday, Russia suspended a 2015 agreement with the United States over Syrian airspace. The memorandum required Moscow and Washington to share flight details on their air campaigns in the country and keep open the lines of communication to minimize the risk of in-air collision or catastrophe as the two countries flew missions over Syria. The United States had warned Russia about the impending air strike, but the Russian Defense Ministry said America was in “grave violation of the memorandum.”

The Pentagon was unclear about the immediate consequence of Russia’s decision to cast aside the agreement.

A Russian Defense Ministry spokesman, Mayor General Igor Konashenkov, said that Moscow would help shore up the most “sensitive Syrian infrastructure,” another clear sign that Russia is refusing to distance itself from Assad.

Tillerson is set to travel to Moscow next week to meet with Russian officials.

Iran condemned the attack “regardless of the perpetrators and the victims,” according to Foreign Ministry spokesman Bahram Ghasemi. He said the U.S. operation will “strengthen terrorists” and add to “the complexity of the situation in Syria and the region.”

President Bashar al-Assad blasted the air strike as “foolish” and “reprehensible” on Syrian state TV. The leader said the United States took an “illegal action” and pointed to it as further evidence of America’s “dirty war against our people.”

The Syrian rebel group Ahrar al-Sham told NBC News it “welcomes any U.S. intervention through surgical strikes that would deter the Assad regime capabilities to kill civilians and shorten the suffering of our people.”

Alaa Alyousef, a 27-year-old resident of Khan Shaykhun who lost at least 25 relatives in the chemical attack, said the U.S. strike “alleviates a small part of our sufferings,” but he’s worried it’s only a face-saving measure.

“What good is a strike on Shayrat air base alone while we have more than 15 other air bases,” he said.

The United States’ allies have been mostly supportive of U.S. action, particularly the United Kingdom, Australia, and Israel.

What's Next?

Less than 24 hours after the strike, aircraft – either Syrian or Russian warplanes – took off from bombed-out airfield for a mission near Palmyra, reports the AFP.

Syrian or Russian aircraft have carried out strikes on at least eight towns since the U.S. intervention, including airstrikes Friday and Saturday on the same town, Khan Sheikhoun, which was struck with chemical weapons on Tuesday.

The Trump administration’s overall policy toward Syria remains unclear and a bit muddled. Following the strike, Tillerson offered this baffling statement: “I would not in any way attempt to extrapolate that to a change in our policy or posture relative to our military activities in Syria today. There has been no change in that status.”

“It does demonstrate that President Trump is willing to act when governments and actors cross the line … and cross the line in the most heinous of ways,” he added.

A senior administration official told CNN that the president’s strike should not be viewed as a full-on campaign to remove Assad from power, and that defeating ISIS remains Trump’s top priority. The official described the strike as a response to the “unacceptability” of the Syrian strongman’s use of chemical weapons.

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, who last week said the White House accepted the “political realities” of Assad staying in power, called Trump’s actions “decisive” but was evasive about Assad’s future. “The Syrian government and the Assad regime should, at a minimum, agree to abide by the agreements they made not to use chemical weapons,” Spicer said. “I think that’s where we start.”

Yet United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley used more forceful language. “The United States took a very measured step last night,” she said. “We are prepared to do more. But we hope that will not be necessary. It is time for all civilized nations to stop the horrors that are taking place in Syria and demand a political solution.”

Senior Pentagon officials are reportedly investigating whether Russia participated in any way in the apparent chemical attack in Syria on Tuesday. The Associated Press reports that a drone was spotted near the site of the chemical attack in Idlib province earlier that day; it is unclear if it belonged to Russian or Syrian forces.

This post has been updated throughout.


What We Know About the U.S. Military Strike Against Syria